Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in file site

Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage along with the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the solution.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, so the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files online at a fixed monthly cost. Therefore the utilization of web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.


In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. 웹하드 순위 Of course, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.

This website was created for free with Webme. Would you also like to have your own website?
Sign up for free